connecteddale

Strategy Coach = Clarity + Alignment

Competencies

A competency framework breaks a role down into the specific observable behaviours that separate strong performance from weak, so development and promotion decisions rest on evidence instead of who seems ready.

Trace the path across four boxes, from a written framework down to one person's development plan.

1 Select the framework 2 Rate against evidence 3 Rank the gaps 4 Build the plan
A four-step sequence from framework to individual development plan.

Reach for this when…

How to run it

  1. Select a competency framework built for the actual role, not a generic list.
  2. Rate the individual against each competency using specific observed behaviour, not impressions.
  3. Rank the gaps by importance to the role, not by what's easiest to fix.
  4. Build a development plan with named actions, stretch assignments and resources against each priority.

A worked example

Situation. Marta Ruiz runs HR for Ruiz Robótica, a small manufacturer in Valencia, Spain, where two of her best engineers had been promoted into team lead roles on technical strength alone and were both close to quitting.

Applied. She ran a competency framework built for the team lead role specifically, rated both against real evidence from the last six months, and found the gap in both cases was delegation and giving direct feedback, not technical judgement.

Result. One engineer took the development plan and grew into the role over two quarters. The other asked to go back to an individual contributor role, and this time the company had language to make that an honest move rather than a demotion.

1 Select the framework 2 Rate against evidence 3 Rank the gaps 4 Build the plan
Whitepine's gap was found at the rating step: both engineers scored low on delegation, not technical skill.

The catch

A competency framework only measures what it was built to measure - a generic off-the-shelf list rates people against a role that isn't quite theirs. Rating also drifts toward whoever writes the most persuasive self-assessment unless it's anchored in specific evidence.

If the framework wasn't built for this specific role, the rating is measuring the wrong job.

Origin: Various (McClelland, Boyatzis, Spencer & Spencer; Lominger/Korn Ferry)