connecteddale

Strategy Coach = Clarity + Alignment

NLP

NLP treats thinking, language and behaviour as changeable patterns, using rapport, precise sensory language and reframing to shift a stuck response rather than analysing why it started.

Five linked boxes move from the core presuppositions through rapport and sensory language to a perceptual shift and a reframe at the end.

1 Core presuppositions 2 Build rapport 3 Sensory-specific language 4 Shift perceptual position 5 Anchor or reframe
The core NLP sequence for shifting a stuck pattern.

Reach for this when…

How to run it

  1. Work from the core presupposition: the map is not the territory, and every behaviour was once the best available choice.
  2. Build rapport by matching body language, tone and pace, not by forcing it.
  3. Use sensory-specific language: ask for evidence, chunk up for the higher intent, chunk down for the concrete step.
  4. Shift perceptual position: their own view, the other person's view, then a detached observer's view.
  5. Apply anchoring or reframing to attach a new response to the trigger.

A worked example

Situation. Dewi Kusuma ran a small marketing agency in Surabaya, Indonesia, and her lead account manager went silent and defensive every time a client raised a complaint.

Applied. Dewi worked the perceptual-position shift with her: her own view of the complaint, then the client's likely view, then a third, detached view of the exchange; the chunk-up question, what does this client actually want long-term, reframed complaints from attacks into information.

Result. The manager started opening complaint calls with a question instead of a defence. Two accounts she'd nearly lost renewed that quarter.

1 Core presuppositions 2 Build rapport 3 Sensory-specific language 4 Shift perceptual position 5 Anchor or reframe
Katarzyna's account manager: the perceptual-position shift reframed complaints as information.

The catch

Much of NLP's specific machinery, like eye-accessing cues and the finer submodality claims, has not held up under research scrutiny, so treat the mechanism claims sceptically even where the practical technique works. Rapport-matching done clumsily reads as mimicry, not connection. It is a toolkit of techniques more than a coherent theory, which makes it easy to cherry-pick badly.

If the rapport-building is noticeable to the other person, it has already failed.

Origin: Richard Bandler & John Grinder