connecteddale

Strategy Coach = Clarity + Alignment

VAK Learning Styles

VAK sorts how people prefer to take in information into three channels, visual, auditory, kinaesthetic, so training and coaching can be designed to reach more than the one style the facilitator naturally uses.

Visual, Auditory and Kinaesthetic sit on three separate cards, each naming a different route information takes in.

Visual sight Auditory hearing Kinaesthetic movement, touch
The three channels VAK sorts information intake into.

Reach for this when…

How to run it

  1. Run the VAK survey: how does this person best take in new information?
  2. Score it to find the dominant modality: visual, auditory, or kinaesthetic.
  3. Debrief what that means for how they actually learn day to day.
  4. Redesign the material to hit all three, not just the dominant one.

A worked example

Situation. Javier Ramírez's induction training at Piezas del Norte in Guadalajara, Mexico, was ninety minutes of him talking at new machine operators, and half of them were still making the same errors a month in.

Applied. He ran the VAK survey on the next intake and found most were strongly kinaesthetic, so he rebuilt induction around hands-on machine time with the manual as backup, not the main event.

Result. Error rates on the new intake dropped inside three weeks, not because the operators got smarter but because the training finally matched how they actually took things in.

The catch

VAK has thin research support as a predictor of learning outcomes; matching teaching style to a stated preference doesn't reliably improve results in controlled studies. Treat it as a design checklist, not a diagnosis. And most people are more mixed than the model's clean labels suggest.

Using VAK to excuse only ever teaching your own preferred way is the opposite of what it's for.

Origin: Walter Barbe, Raymond Swassing & Michael Milone (VAK); Neil Fleming later built the related four-channel VARK model on top of it.